Breckland
Council Budget Setting Meeting, Thurs 26th February 2015
Views
of Breckland Labour Group
"There is much detail in these reports and
I thank those members and officers that have been involved in their production.
I found very informative the Director of Place (Julie Kennealy) presentation at the Overview and Scrutiny Commission meeting and I thank her for
that.
There was a very positive and upbeat tone
at that meeting and lots of “aren’t we doing well?” – forgive me if I do not
join in completely.
This is not a package of measures that
should be applauded and trumpeted in totality. Whilst there are a number of
aspects that I applaud, keeping car parking free for example, and recently
committed to regeneration projects as well as the proposals agreed to this week in relation to support for neighbourhood plans. Many will see this is a budget that
continues to provide very limited services for people in the District and
offers little sign of action to address many concerns that exist. I could highlight
bold measures taken by neighbouring councils and I could talk at length Mr Chairman about
what aspects I have concerns with and what I would feel the other priorities of
residents are – but I am restricted to my 3 minutes long response and I recognize that
ultimately, the Conservative majority of this Council will pass this budget.
I do however want to offer one improvement to this budget as I would see it -
Housing continues to be the issue that is
raised with me above any else Mr Chairman, and that is why I would therefore
like to propose an amendment to this budget. Appendix E highlights the money
due to be received in New Homes bonus income up to 2019. It’s purpose....? for ‘community
projects’.
If we are to address our housing issues, we need to make the funds
available and I would therefore propose that this money is ring-fenced for
community housing projects, with a specific focus on creating one and two
bedroom properties. Some of this money is needed to fill a gap in the revenue
budget, but for the amount simply being transferred to reserves, which
currently has not planned usage – we could be making better use of. This would
serve a number of purposes; increasing the number of affordable homes that are
available clearly, but also alleviating the impact of the spare room subsidy, commonly
known as the bedroom tax, by providing alternative accommodation for those that
have been hit by this.
Recently published figures show that there has been a
55% increase in the number of people in Breckland that are in receipt of
housing benefit, even though they are working.
Such is the demand for housing,
landlords can charge rents that are unaffordable and this gets topped up by tax
payers – what a waste of public funds in a time of austerity. Public funds
should be spent on providing good quality, affordable homes, rather than paying
off the mortgages of private landlords on an industrial scale. We need to turn
that current situation on its head. We know too that there have been over 1,000
families affected by the bedroom tax in our District alone and whilst I am not
sure to what extend other members here are aware of personal cases, I can could
recount many to members which are very distressing. Utilising this money in
this way would help to generate further income, partly from additional new
homes bonus money, but also through the rents from the properties.
If there were one
aspect of this budget where I would urge a re-focus, this would be it.
AMENDMENT
– Proposed by Councillor Jermy
a)
For the ‘New Homes bonus’ income, as outlined in Appendix B, not required to
support the revenue budget and currently being proposed to be transferred to
reserves for an unspecified purpose - to be ring-fenced for ‘community housing
projects’. B) Officers to be asked to investigate options for utilizing this
money, with a specific focus on creating 1 and 2 bedroom properties, with options
to be tabled to a future Cabinet meeting.